Not long ago, and presently in many circles, sound quality ("SQ") was said to be best represented by audio systems amplifying with the lowest Total Harmonic Distortion ("THD") measurement.
Overlapping the THD focus was realization and consideration of Transient Intermodulation Distortion ("TIM", AKA Slew-Induced Distortion "SID"), also a quantitative measurement said to better describe sound quality.
There are other measurements purporting to describe sound quality and maybe taken altogether the measurements give some ballpark sense of potential sound quality. But, "sound quality" in the human sense -- despite some authoritarian claims and challenges -- has so far eluded reduction to objective measurements and numbers.
Attainment of evermore absurdly "perfect" THD figures (0.001% THD, etc.) has most often been accomplished by means of solid-state/transistorized amplification for its usual real benefits of size, heat and cost reduction.
But The Emperor Has No Ears
In parallel with the increasingly measurement-oriented obsession (and claimed audible improvements) was growing awareness of decreasing 'sound quality' -- the better the numbers became, generally and often enough to persist, the worse 'the sound' became. Anecdotal evidence of this truth abounds, probably in every family. Look to practically any issue of "The Absolute Sound", "Stereophile" and similar publications.
Tubes Measure Worse But Sound Better
Meanwhile, tube amplifiers that boost audio power by means of electron valves have notoriously higher THD and TIM/SID measurements yet are often regarded as having better 'sound quality' compared to transistorized amplifiers. Debates of 'which sounds better, transistors or tubes?' have waged for decades in the popular press and throughout audiophile concerns.
There is enormous difference between transistors and tubes regarding their internal workings. From our Articles section:
Tubes use a charged electron plasma cloud in vacuum (see space charge), while transistors force audio signal current through something not unlike dirty sand --possibly why 'brittle, hard, sharp, gritty and scratchy' often describe "transistor sound" [April 2012, years after writing this we discovered Alexander Dumble, creator of what many musicians consider to be among the best-sounding guitar amplifiers ever made, concurs: "The difference comes down to this: The more fragile harmonics can survive in a vacuum tube, [versus how] they seem to be eliminated or squashed in a solid-state crystal lattice...electrons can survive [with greater fidelity] in a free-space vacuum where they have trouble in a crystal lattice."].
Difference in circuit complexity also bolsters Dumble's claim. Whereas rather linear tube circuits are usually simple, most transistor circuits require high negative feedback and more complexity. The All American Five was for decades a popular and common radio, requiring only five tubes in surprisingly simple circuitry. "Transistorization" happened for economy, not better sound -- in this case, cheaper was just cheaper. In terms of gracefulness, straightforward simplicity and perhaps ultimately sound quality, transistorized amplification seems to often fall short. See also How Does a Transistor Work.
Others have presented more esoteric conjectures: Listen from 3:15 into interview with Preston Nichols (Montauk / Philadelphia Experiment), regarding otherworldliness of electrons in a vacuum tube: 'In vacuum tubes... an electron is a particle and a wave, just like a photon is... electron in a vacuum becomes and operates as a wave... different set of properties for vacuum-conducted (wave) electron versus metal-conducted (particle) electrons... vacuum tubes hit the spiritual level... electrons are moving into another reality... electrons in a vacuum approach god / godliness.' -- "...Preston Nichols has developed a considerable reputation for his alleged involvement in time travel and secret government projects. However, it is not very well known at all that he was just as deeply involved in the music scene of the 1960's as rock 'n roll came to center stage in world pop culture." -- from Peter Moon's book "Music in Time".
On the other hand, leaps in design of transistorized amplification have been made by industry icons including Nelson Pass, Bob Pease, Bob Widlar, Walter G. Jung, and others. David Berning, one of the oldest and most respected audio designers, notably often combines tubes and transistors, excellently leveraging the benefits of each technology toward improving overall sound quality.
Digital Signal Processing ("DSP") introduces into audio equipment design the wonderful but complex mathematical manipulation of digitized signals. Izotope is well-known in pro-audio for its seemingly magical products. In mobile audio, "DSP processors" are used primarily to shape the equalization curve, apply steep crossover functions to split audio signals amongst the speakers best suited to handle the frequency ranges, and to apply various delays which aid psyco-acoustic perceptions of spatiality and enhance impact, coherence, clarity and "sound-stage". See below, however, for recent example of when digitalia goes too far.
"Panelists consisting of industry experts in home and mobile audio assembled in Scottsdale, AZ, on February 23, 2013, to discuss topics related to achieving sound quality in mobile audio, along with ways to grow the mobile audio industry."
See also Earl Zausmer's BMW-540
This regards digital-audio technology (D-AT) in general, we believe, not any particular manufacturer or equipment; rather, the audibly "harsh and not pleasant" plight of D-AT, it reasonably seems, would be manufacturer-agnostic. The digital quantization of innately (necessarily?) analog modes has esoteric roots (and debates) that span millenia, beyond "quantum mechanics" psyence and theoretical quantizability to Greek atomicity in lore. At what slices and dices fine enough, or in sufficient quantity, could parts indiscernibly reconstitute or even tolerably represent any whole? (ref Georges Seurat, divisionism / pointillism)
1. Initial email from an Audio Enthusiast in Amsterdam, early 2020
2. Initial response from Michael Milbert
3. Audio Enthusiast:
4. Michael Milbert:
5. Audio Enthusiast:
6. Michael Milbert:
7. Audio Enthusiast:
8. Michael Milbert:
9. Audio Enthusiast:
10. Your turn, dear reader -- Anyone have a suggestion for a great-sounding transistorized amplifier? Please email us your experience and specific details and we will post here. An interested car audiophile in the Netherlands awaits.